We added a frame of brood with a swarm cell on it to a split hive last week that we thought was queenless. Turns out it wasn’t queenless, because by the looks of it, the queen inside the swarm cell was destroyed — stung to death by a queen that was already in the hive, then pulled dead from the swarm cell by worker bees. If a queen had emerged from the swarm cell, the cell would be open on the bottom, not the side. The hive had several frames of freshly capped brood when we checked it yesterday. I don’t think a week old queen could mate and begin laying that fast. Thus ends my interpretation of the above photo. I could be wrong.

One Response to “A Destroyed Swarm Cell”

SKIP TO THE END
  1. Phillip says:

    Note that adding a frame of brood WITH A SWARM CELL ON IT was not the smartest move. Had the queen in the swarm cell emerged, she probably would have fought the queen that was already present — a fight that often results in two dead queens or one surviving but wounded and weak queen.

    Adding a frame of brood would have been better. That way, if the colony was queenless, they could have made a new queen from the open brood. And if it wasn’t queenless, well, extra brood to boost the population is rarely a bad thing for a weak hive.

    We got lucky this time.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please keep the comments clean and civil. Most comments or links posted for promotional or commercial purposes will be deleted. The spelling and syntax of some comments may be corrected for readability from time to time. Private messages can be directed to the Mud Songs email address posted on the Contact page.