No Queen Excluder = Brood in the Honey?

Here’s what happened in one of my hives this year when I installed a honey super without a queen excluder:

crap01-2013-10-13 12.30.49

The queen laid eggs throughout most of the honey frames. A full shallow super full of comb honey ruined.

crap02-2013-10-13 12.30.43

Many beekeepers claim that a queen excluder acts as a “honey excluder” because worker bees, arguably, would rather stay down below before trying to squeeze through the excluder. Subsequently, the bees may fill up the brood nest with honey before they go above the excluder, which can leave the queen honey bound and the brood chamber crowded, which encourages swarming.

crap03-2013-10-13 12.29.58

The same beekeepers usually argue that queen excluders aren’t necessary because the queen won’t cross a natural honey barrier (a ring of honey) above the brood nest.

To which I respond with a definite MAYBE. I’m not saying they’re wrong. However, the queen in one of my excluderless hives got into the honey super and the result was a big ugly mess that I’d rather not deal with again. Maybe queen excluders aren’t the greatest invention around. Too bad. I’ll live with them for now.

Cutting drone brood from an otherwise beautiful frame of comb honey…

crap04-2013-10-13 12.30.27

…sucks.

AUGUST 29, 2015: Tony Bees, who drills access holes in each of his honey supers, uses queen excluders and it seems to work well for him. I think I’ll try it.

Something that’s good to know: I’ve learned that it’s best not to use a queen excluder on honey supers that don’t have drawn frames. Once the bees have drawn out the frames, then I add the queen excluder.